Do you need a gun to stay safe during a disaster?
After Superstorm Sandy there were a few articles that asked what happened to the looting. Certainly there were examples of looting reported, but compared to the population density of New York and New Jersey it was relatively minor.
I think in light of the gun debate going on in Washington and around the country lately, it's time to weigh in on one of the arguments I hear. As an authority on emergency preparedness, I regularly see folks concerned with prepping for a disaster arming themselves against civil unrest. But, in the most common disaster scenarios, there won't be any civil unrest to speak of.
What do you think? Comment below to weigh in.
|| Twitter | Facebook | Newsletter Signup ||